Entry tags:
60th anniversary
We just celebrated the 60th anniversary of Roswell by watching the DS9 episode Little Green Men (Ferengi at Roswell), and since we were in a time-travel mood, we also saw the SG1 ep 1969 (Sam in pink glasses, hippy Teal'c and the war with Canada). :-)

no subject
no subject
One of the investigators who claimed it was a balloon had recanted on his deathbed.
no subject
For anyone who's interested in the subject, I strongly recommend a book called The Real Roswell Crashed-Saucer Coverup (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1573921645/bettyraganshomep), which goes into things in great and very readable detail.
no subject
no subject
Besides the evidence is not that strong as all the material recovered is still kept pretty much under wraps.The mylar balloon was not revealed until days later and weather balloons are NOT saucer shaped.and do not match eyewitness accounts given at the time.
I doubt if the true story will ever be revealed.
no subject
I could blather more, but I'll spare you. The point is, especially once you eliminate all the later embellishments, it's a lot simpler to believe in a weather balloon than a cover-up UFO, even if it may be less fun. In this case, I, at least, believe the truth is out there, it's just that people tend to prefer fiction. :)
no subject
The Roswell incident is a good demonstration though of the power of belief and how "faiths" can develop.
no subject
But this really doesn't seem like the place to get into an in-depth discussion about the subject, and I'm not an expert on the matter, just someone who's read other people's investigations on the subjects and found their research and logic sound enough to be extremely convincing. (Plus, I live in New Mexico and have seen first-hand what a huge interest certain groups have in keeping the whole Roswell mythos going.) Again, for anybody who really wants to see in-depth arguments and answers to this kind of question, I recommend Klass' book.
The Roswell incident is a good demonstration though of the power of belief and how "faiths" can develop.
Oh, yes. It really, really is. :)
no subject
For the sceptic no evidence can be strong enough and for the believer any argument otherwise is a cover-up conspiracy.
no subject
For the sceptic no evidence can be strong enough
People for whom that is the case don't deserve the term "skeptic," IMHO. That's not skepticism, that's just denial. I call myself a skeptic, but show me a spaceship, and I'll believe in it! :)
no subject
no subject
Never seen the TV show, though. I think it's on my Netflix queue somewhere, because I remember being curious about it.
no subject
no subject
no subject
BTW Emilie de Ravin (Claire on Lost) plays an occasional character, Tess.
no subject
no subject