vilakins: (danger)
Nico ([personal profile] vilakins) wrote2005-09-11 04:46 pm

Good one!

Just posted to a mailing list I'm on. [evil grin]

This test only has one question, but it's a very important one. Please don't answer it without giving it some serious thought. The test features an unlikely, completely fictional situation in which you will have to make an important decision.

You're in Florida...In Miami, to be exact... There is chaos around you, caused by a hurricane and severe floods. This is a flood of major proportions. You are a photojournalist working for a major newspaper caught in the middle of this great disaster. The situation is nearly hopeless.

You're trying to shoot career-making photos. There are houses and people swirling around you, some disappearing under the water. Nature is showing all its destructive fury. You see a man in the water. He is fighting for his life, trying not to be swept away with the water and debris. You move closer. Somehow the man looks familiar.

Suddenly, you know who it is... it's George W Bush!

At the same time you notice that the raging waters are about to take him under, forever. You know for a fact that he will die if you don't do something quickly. You have only two options. You can save him or you can take the most dramatic photos of your life. You can save the life of George W Bush or you can shoot a Pulitzer Prize-winning photo, documenting the death of one of the world's most powerful men.

Now, here's the question (and please give an honest answer):

The question

Would you select colour film, or go with the classic simplicity of black and white?

kernezelda: (walking away)

[personal profile] kernezelda 2005-09-11 04:56 am (UTC)(link)
Classic simplicity, of course!

[identity profile] astrogirl2.livejournal.com 2005-09-11 05:05 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, my, that is evil.

*tries hard not to giggle*

[identity profile] snowgrouse.livejournal.com 2005-09-11 05:08 am (UTC)(link)
BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!:D:D:D

[identity profile] labingi.livejournal.com 2005-09-11 05:12 am (UTC)(link)
That's classic! So what's the moral difference between color and black/white?
kerravonsen: Cally in the dark: all alone in the night (alone in the night)

[personal profile] kerravonsen 2005-09-11 05:19 am (UTC)(link)
Oh dear.

[identity profile] kerr-avon.livejournal.com 2005-09-11 05:40 am (UTC)(link)
Black and white. That's how Dubya always saw everything anyway.

[identity profile] kerravongenius.livejournal.com 2005-09-11 06:32 am (UTC)(link)
You wouldn't get a prize. It's hardly news that the flood waters are contaminated with all manner of pollution. I suspect I would be fully occupied in holding his head under, anyway.

[identity profile] grumpoldusenaut.livejournal.com 2005-09-11 08:23 am (UTC)(link)
Black and white, of course. It's an image that must be preserved for posterity, and black and white still has much better archival qualities than colour does. (I assume from context that we're talking silver salts film here, not digital).

[identity profile] sallymn.livejournal.com 2005-09-11 11:11 am (UTC)(link)
Tough choice... maybe black and white when he goes down for the first time, colour when he goes down for the second time...

[identity profile] alinewrites.livejournal.com 2005-09-11 02:40 pm (UTC)(link)
ROTFL!
ext_6322: (Dr Eccleston)

[identity profile] kalypso-v.livejournal.com 2005-09-12 01:42 am (UTC)(link)
I'm afraid I'm too pragmatic for this. If he drowns, we just get Cheney, which doesn't seem like much of an improvement, so I yank him out, take some unflattering snaps as he's spewing out water, then head off to deliver leftwing tirades against the entire administration on all the TV channels who are queuing up to interview me about it.

[identity profile] linda-joyce.livejournal.com 2005-09-12 12:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Black and white of course but if I had just a few seconds more I'd take a few colour shots with my digital